User talk:Aqua
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
The Hitchhicker Container is missing. Are other default parts missing? Aqua (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2013 (CST)
- "How" is it missing? Or where? — xZise [talk] 20:05, 24 November 2013 (CST)
- My bad. I'm sorry. I searched it at least 5 times in the parts article and couldn't find it. And now I looked another two times and found it. -_- The parts list is way to big. There must be way to shorten it. Aqua (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2013 (CST)
- I'm afraid that this is not possible. Or at least I don't know how you could do that. For example {{Parts}} also contain all parts and is huge. We are now already using two foldable list inside each other. I noticed you tried to fix that one TWR column several times. You could do something like
{{lang|en=foo|de=bar|force=de}}to test the German text in the preview window. Of course you shouldn't forget to remove the second parameter prior to saving the page. — xZise [talk] 08:38, 25 November 2013 (CST)- How about stripping the parts article of all the detailed pieces of information? I imagine a simple collection of part pictures with only the names beneath them. Anybody who wants more details then hat to click on a picture or name and get redirected to the specific article or an overview of the part class (i.e. this or that). Because I now know you're German: Ich schlage vor, die ganzen Zusatzinfos aus dem Parts-Artikel zu entfernen. Es sollen nur noch die Bilder und die Part-Namen übrig bleiben. Wer dann genauere Infos haben will, muss dann auf den Part-Namen oder -Bild klicken und wird dann auf den entsprechenden Part-Artikel oder eine Kategorieansicht mit den großen Tabellen weitergeleitet. Mit jedem Klick würde der User dann von der einfachen Übersicht in das komplexere Innere eintauchen. Aqua (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- Und weil ich gerade einen Admin am Haken habe (:p), wie kann ich Templates besser testen? Gerade [das] hat mir Kopfzerbrechen bereitet. Ich weiß nicht genau, woran es liegt, dass die Tabellen zerschossen werden. Ich vermute, es hängt an den Zeilenumbrüchen oder den anderen white space characters. Dass man das Ergebnis nicht einfach so sieht, ist... doof. Aqua (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2013 (CST)
- I'm afraid that this is not possible. Or at least I don't know how you could do that. For example {{Parts}} also contain all parts and is huge. We are now already using two foldable list inside each other. I noticed you tried to fix that one TWR column several times. You could do something like
- My bad. I'm sorry. I searched it at least 5 times in the parts article and couldn't find it. And now I looked another two times and found it. -_- The parts list is way to big. There must be way to shorten it. Aqua (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2013 (CST)
