Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • * Replace [[:Category:image thumbnails|image thumbnails]] with higher-quality images (reduced to the needed size via the <tt><nowik ...ation files]] and infoboxes of the parts. If required it also creates stub part pages if new parts were added. Because Squad might do changes which break t
    4 KB (671 words) - 18:01, 9 October 2022
  • ...new-style LFEs). I'm starting to think that we need to reorganize this by part type and completely ignore VAB/SPH tabs. Also, split off [[Demo parts]], s ...ut it's confusing to have s for liquid engines and m/s for solids, and the part.cfg files list Isp for liquids in s. [[User:Entroper|Entroper]] ([[User tal
    58 KB (9,534 words) - 17:35, 8 September 2023
  • ...nowiki> is just there so the software DOES not change it. So only copy the part between it. --> or by clicking on the pen in bar above. It will then link t ...what the holy sh*t! (BUT at least there is such an almost totally useless part like the RT-5 "Flea" SRB!) Has anyone tried it? It is a real torture to bui
    25 KB (4,176 words) - 19:39, 9 April 2018
  • ...wever, the Mediawiki software still fails to convert .svg images into .png thumbnails, displaying the following error: ...lled Vector skin is actually fully up to date with the version supplied as part of 1.24.2 (which includes all of the functionality previously supplied by t
    6 KB (961 words) - 14:42, 24 March 2022
  • ...? Instead of letting the wiki do it for us, we'd have to reupload all the thumbnails. ::: I was talking about people uploading thumbnails instead of thumbnailing them with the wiki.
    7 KB (1,222 words) - 21:44, 5 April 2013
  • ...nfoboxes. I “fixed” your two images, but maybe you could do it for any part in the future. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk] Hi, how do you determine if a part is coated in MLI? They don't look very insulated. — [[User:XZise|xZise]]
    6 KB (1,033 words) - 00:50, 21 October 2013
  • * “Loseless compressed”: Especially the small thumbnails look awful with the jpg artefacts. <!-- If there is an article about an experiment (not the part) which doesn't redirect here, that should be used. Otherwise use the intern
    60 KB (9,443 words) - 02:40, 4 January 2021
  • Basically, I'm trying to create a universal template for part stats tables that would automatically select headers based off of a set of ...divide the stock parts page into sub-pages and replace the main page with thumbnails. Also, I've been brainstorming a bit about the stats table formatting and I
    19 KB (3,165 words) - 12:33, 23 June 2015
  • ...23;&#123;parent&#125;&#125;&#125;/&#123;&#123;&#123;part&#125;&#125;&#125;/part.cfg''</span>. With the new part infobox system, where parts of the infobox are extracted into modules the c
    7 KB (1,224 words) - 17:18, 8 April 2018
  • ...is not a good idea (uploaded thumbnails increase the workload twofold if a part is updated). The smaller image is cached, so this incurs no additional load
    10 members (0 subcategories, 10 files) - 20:54, 6 February 2014
  • ...gest something in the talk page. Just want to inform you here so that this part doesn't get lost. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|ta ...Parts page to include at least one instance of every currently implemented part. The reason I'd been dividing up hybrid parts into multiple tables and movi
    18 KB (3,064 words) - 20:59, 5 March 2017
  • == Marking Thumbnails == ...bnails are jpg, which don't allow for alpha channels. Should I mark these thumbnails for deletion? To make them easier to find? Or just leave them be? Only c
    2 KB (253 words) - 13:31, 18 August 2014
  • :And about size, I'm not sure. Currently the part infoboxes scale the images to 190x190 pixels. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <sma ...e part infobox. Is there anything else for image manipulation? (apart from part-pictures - I on them)<small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned
    5 KB (739 words) - 13:32, 10 October 2014
  • ...surement for your second complaint but I think (unless we start adding the part's height) that those tanks could help as a guideline. And especially for th ...meaning. Now, it is replaced with "1.25m" and "2.5m" in official naming of part. The Mk* naming seems stable. The motivation of "ii" is same as replacement
    5 KB (785 words) - 13:33, 3 March 2015
  • ...same type and variant can now be stacked in a single inventory slot. Each part has a maximum allowed stack amount. * Crewable part masses revised to account for crew mass and their cargo.
    11 KB (1,705 words) - 18:31, 9 July 2021