Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kerbin"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Links: new section)
('Kermunist': new section)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
All the links used in the references are broken.  Just an FYI. -- [[User:N3X15|N3X15]] ([[User talk:N3X15|talk]]) 09:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 
All the links used in the references are broken.  Just an FYI. -- [[User:N3X15|N3X15]] ([[User talk:N3X15|talk]]) 09:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
== 'Kermunist' ==
 +
 +
Should this term really be used? [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] ([[User talk:Thecoshman|talk]]) 18:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:28, 7 October 2012

Infobox

I've attempted to make an infobox template for planets, Template:Planetbox, to bring it closer in line to the stock parts here and planets on wikipedia. Any advice would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigmt (talkcontribs)

  • So far, so good. I think you have more columns than you originally anticipated, though, so many of the cellss are floating around. -- N3X15 (talk) 19:22, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the length of the template is breaking some formatting stuff on articles it's transcluded in. It looks good, but I'd personally trim it down to mass/diameter/etc. and leave orbital information in the article proper. --  Trinexx  ►  19:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

So, leave orbital characteristics in the article itself and keep physical characteristics in the box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigmt (talkcontribs)

  • That's my personal recommendation, at least. I imagine other people have their own opinions on the matter. --  Trinexx  ►  20:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Links

All the links used in the references are broken. Just an FYI. -- N3X15 (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

'Kermunist'

Should this term really be used? Thecoshman (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)