Difference between revisions of "User:XZise/Part"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (*here you have centered CSS ftw;)
m (*use the second manufacturer option;)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Infobox/Part
 
{{Infobox/Part
 
|file=Rapier_Engine_01.png
 
|file=Rapier_Engine_01.png
|manufacturer=C7 Aerospace Division and Rockmax Conglomerate
+
|manufacturer=C7 Aerospace Division
 +
|manufacturer2=Rockmax Conglomerate
 
|size=s
 
|size=s
 
|costs=5900
 
|costs=5900
Line 9: Line 10:
 
|tolerance=20
 
|tolerance=20
 
|since=0.23
 
|since=0.23
|part=liquidEngine
+
|part=rapierEngine
 +
|parent=Engine
 
|role=Hybrid engine
 
|role=Hybrid engine
 
|more=
 
|more=
Line 22: Line 24:
 
{{User:XZise/Part/JE
 
{{User:XZise/Part/JE
 
|thrust=190
 
|thrust=190
|fuel=0.3023
+
|stall=?
 +
|isp=800
 
|vectoring=3
 
|vectoring=3
 
}}
 
}}
Line 34: Line 37:
 
* Also some parameters are superfluous (e.g. vectoring)
 
* Also some parameters are superfluous (e.g. vectoring)
 
:: This might be only the case here, but maybe future other hybrid engines have different vectoring values?
 
:: This might be only the case here, but maybe future other hybrid engines have different vectoring values?
 +
 +
→ [[Template_talk:Infobox/Part#Rework_the_template.3F|Discussion]]

Latest revision as of 18:02, 28 December 2013

XZise
Part image
Hybrid engine by
C7 Aerospace Divisionand Rockmax Conglomerate

Radial size Small
Cost (total) 5 900.00 Funds
Mass (total) 1.750 t
Drag 0.2
Max. Temp. 3600 K
Impact Tolerance 20 m/s
Research Unknown
Unlock cost 0 Funds
Since version 0.23
Part configuration [[Parts/Engine/rapierEngine/{{{filename}}}|{{{filename}}}]]
Liquid fuel engine
Maximum thrust (1 atm) 155.56 kN
(vacuum) 175.00 kN
Isp (1 atm) 320 s
(vacuum) 360 s

Template:Infobox/Part/FuelConsumption

Thrust vectoring 3 °
Jet engine
Maximum thrust 190 kN
Stall Threshold  ? kN
Isp 800 s

Template:Infobox/Part/FuelConsumption Template:Infobox/Part/FuelConsumption

Thrust vectoring 3 °

This is an example how I "envision" the next generation of part templates. Current problems with this system:

  • Most of the names are already used
There might be a workaround: Use the same name for both templates, but if the mass parameter is determined it treats it as the old version?
  • There might be multiple properties with the same name (e.g. maximum thrust)
I added headers here manually, in the final version, those headers should be integrated in the subtemplates. Maybe rearrange them, that research and since are not below the specific ones (or separate them with another header)
  • Also some parameters are superfluous (e.g. vectoring)
This might be only the case here, but maybe future other hybrid engines have different vectoring values?

Discussion