Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mün"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Hey guys, can someone fix the geostationary orbit? I got no idea what's wrong with the code there, and any searches I did for a straight-out-number redirect to here. --[[User:Stelith61|Stelith61]] ([[User talk:Stelith61|talk]]) 12:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 
Hey guys, can someone fix the geostationary orbit? I got no idea what's wrong with the code there, and any searches I did for a straight-out-number redirect to here. --[[User:Stelith61|Stelith61]] ([[User talk:Stelith61|talk]]) 12:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Fixed. It seems like the [[Template:Sigfigs]] is incompatible to the new version of [[Template:OrbitAltitude]] --[[User:Crush|Crush]] ([[User talk:Crush|talk]]) 07:43, 7 April 2013 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:43, 7 April 2013

I do not agree with renaming the Mun to "Mün" as done by User:Eduardog3000. The moon is still labeled "Mun" in game and unless that changes, I do not see a need to have it labeled Mün ingame. I am aware there is confusion regarding this, which was strengthened by the new Title screen with the "Mün or bust" scene, but unless the "ü" makes it ingame, I suggest keeping "Mun" as the Wiki definition for now. --Senshi (talk) 09:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I completely agree, this is just plain inaccurate. --Craigmt1 (talk) 16:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


Hey guys, can someone fix the geostationary orbit? I got no idea what's wrong with the code there, and any searches I did for a straight-out-number redirect to here. --Stelith61 (talk) 12:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. It seems like the Template:Sigfigs is incompatible to the new version of Template:OrbitAltitude --Crush (talk) 07:43, 7 April 2013 (CDT)