Difference between revisions of "Talk:Planned features"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::That's what the [[Version History]] is for... --[[User:The-Bean|The-Bean]] ([[User talk:The-Bean|talk]]) 12:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | ::That's what the [[Version History]] is for... --[[User:The-Bean|The-Bean]] ([[User talk:The-Bean|talk]]) 12:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | Causeless - I'd say it's much easier to that a quick glance at this page for an overall idea than needing to hunt through the update history. Not to mention that newcomers may be confused when they only see one planned feature and won't realize the game may be near to completion. Sure, the title of the page implies only planned features, but it's really a question of either fitting the technical details perfectly (in expense of both ease of use and simplicity), or doing the simpler, easier, and really more intuitive option. | + | :::Causeless - I'd say it's much easier to that a quick glance at this page for an overall idea than needing to hunt through the update :::history. Not to mention that newcomers may be confused when they only see one planned feature and won't realize the game may be near :::to completion. Sure, the title of the page implies only planned features, but it's really a question of either fitting the technical :::details perfectly (in expense of both ease of use and simplicity), or doing the simpler, easier, and really more intuitive option. |
Revision as of 15:29, 19 June 2012
Hey, shouldn't the EVA feature be in green, because it's the main focus of the next update? And maybe Long-duration smoke trails and Fuel-dependent larger explosions too, because Silisko is working on better particle effects for 0.16? Trbinsc (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- As this page is currently arranged, probably. That said, A 3rd color for features in the next update might be clearer. UmbralRaptor (talk) 04:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Causeless - I decided on a new colour due to the new update cycles not guaranteeing features any more.
Wouldn't it make sense to remove the features that have been added (green). After all, these are the planned features.The-Bean (talk) 10:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Causeless - Nah, I think it's nice in showing how far the game has progressed.
- That's what the Version History is for... --The-Bean (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Causeless - I'd say it's much easier to that a quick glance at this page for an overall idea than needing to hunt through the update :::history. Not to mention that newcomers may be confused when they only see one planned feature and won't realize the game may be near :::to completion. Sure, the title of the page implies only planned features, but it's really a question of either fitting the technical :::details perfectly (in expense of both ease of use and simplicity), or doing the simpler, easier, and really more intuitive option.
