|
|
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | | | |
| | Could we get an update? There are two new planets now, and I imagine people are being turned away if the wiki looks that outdated. | | Could we get an update? There are two new planets now, and I imagine people are being turned away if the wiki looks that outdated. |
| − |
| |
| − | == New Wiki section Encyclopedia of Space Travel terms and topics related to KSP ("Encyclopedia" for short) ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Considering everyone's desire to add pages defining every single concept and term used in KSP or this Wiki, we might want to make a section dedicated to that.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This would include some pages that contain lists of terms, but also have some pages dedicated to a single term of worthy note, like [[rocket engine]] or [[jet engine]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Each term should mainly be documented in context to its use in KSP, but for educational purposes would also include contrasting to real world rocketry and space travel, and a link to the usually more detailed, and technical, Wikipedia article on the real world equivalent.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The goal here would be to provide both a knowledge base, make it easier to read and write documentation (not having to worry about vocabulary issues), and to provide a way to make learning the game via this wiki a fun educational exploration of the concepts around space travel.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The easy way to expand this over time is simple: If you are a regular contributor, maintainer or moderator, and have to look up a term, and it's not in the encyclopedia, it should be recommended add it in the appropriate place in the encyclopedia.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The end goal of this project should be that exploring the documentation on this Wiki and learning about space travel in the process of planning your next KSP should be as fun and captivating as playing KSP. This will encourage users to spend hours planning fun and complex missions, and really learning about space travel in the process. <small>— Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ruedii|Ruedii]] ([[User talk:Ruedii|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ruedii|contribs]])</small>
| |
| − | :Do you mean some kind of general "table of contents", split up into sections (mathematic terms, part types, spacecraft types, guides, etc.)? Because what you are saying is basically the purpose of this wiki. There is however no central "starting place", that is true. --[[User:Dgelessus|dgelessus]] <sup>([[User talk:Dgelessus|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Dgelessus|contribs]])</sup> 15:46, 29 July 2013 (CDT)
| |
| − | :Hmmm, there is already [[terminology]] with quite a list of terms. Although many pages are lacking categories which automatically would generate a list of terms of that kind (like [[:Category:Physics]]?). Also you can search easily for a term (which would I define as “starting place”), so if you wondering how liquid fuel engines work, you can search for that. Of course if it is missing but you think there should be one and you have no idea about this topic (that why you were searching it here) it is hard to let other (maybe experienced) editors know about that missing article. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 16:22, 29 July 2013 (CDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::While it could be handled by various methods, either using the category system, or even using a separate wiki namespaces. The articles would obviously use a separate standard for writing method than for the direct game reference, as it would focus on general concepts, theories and terminology to provide the user with a better understanding of the general concepts behind space flight, as opposed to focusing on the information about the in-game assets in KSP, and functioning as a reference guide. The pages would have a generally different writing style than the in-game asset ones. However, as you mentioned, we may want to work on better organizing what we have before setting a roadmap to flush it out with new stuff. Do you think I should write a roadmap for better organization, and adding of category systems. I'll probably place it in my user namespace until it's flushed out, then see about moving it. Generally what I am proposing does, as the two of you suggested, consist of organizing the information we have, making it easier to find, setting more detailed standards and templates for future material, and flushing it out with more information.--[[User:Ruedii|Ruedii]] ([[User talk:Ruedii|talk]]) 22:54, 29 July 2013 (CDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == KSP's Extended Community ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | There's the forum of course, and some parts of it could definitely use to get more attention than they currently do, but there are also lots of other places KSPers congregate, two semi-official IRC channels, the reddit, those other social sites... Some of these would be a good addition to the main page, for others it may be appropriate to have a listing page, but it'll need to be curated and I don't imagine that will be particularly fun.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * IRC://IRC.Esper.net/KSPOfficial - I don't go here, but I here it's a silly place
| |
| − | * IRC://IRC.Esper.net/KSPModders - Definitely a silly place, but a hugely useful resource in all levels of modding
| |
| − | * http://www.reddit.com/r/KerbalSpaceProgram
| |
| − |
| |
| − | --[[User:Greys|Greys]] ([[User talk:Greys|talk]]) 00:48, 16 September 2013 (CDT)
| |
| − | :May I ask why you post this here? Do you want those links added to the Main Page? — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>[[[User talk:XZise|talk]]]</small> 06:06, 16 September 2013 (CDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::I couldn't think of a better place to ask and I do think the IRC channels should be on the main page. I also couldn't think of enough that I'm familiar with to immediately justify a whole page, and as you've probably noticed I'm fairly inexperienced at wiki life, so I try to avoid making edits to important live pages without consulting 'the elders'
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::--[[User:Greys|Greys]] ([[User talk:Greys|talk]]) 14:43, 16 September 2013 (CDT)
| |
| | | | |
| | == comment == | | == comment == |
Could we get an update? There are two new planets now, and I imagine people are being turned away if the wiki looks that outdated.
Having been a lurker here for a while, and snooping for useful info, I have found the tutorials pretty good. But the direct users guide kind of game play descriptions not as well organized. Such as how to use the Settings Menu or the Nav ball should be more prominently displayed. I would like to make some edits, but would like some discussion or feed back first.Lefick (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2013 (CDT)
Recent events 0.19 and 0.18 dates are wrong as they were released in 2012. Someone with more info about those could fix the dates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuupertunut (talk • contribs)
I'm just thinking, maybe rename the kerbal space program wiki to Kerbapedia?Just a suggestion. --Mozziedoo (talk) 03:17, 6 February 2014 (CST)
There's plenty of online tools for calculations related to the game (orbits, Δv etc.) and there isn't a forum thread or wiki page that has at least a rudimentary list of them, which I think would be beneficial. If it's ok, I'd like to make one here on the wiki for inclusion on the main page (as it seems the logical place to put it imho) - I don't think the forum would be ideal for this as it would require me (or whoever creates the thread) to be the sole maintainer, unlike the wiki. --MechaLynx (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2014 (CDT)
