Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gas planet 2"

From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Should it be kept?: new section)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'm not sure if stuff like this should be added. It is more like a concept and then of only one developer 3 and a half months ago. But still we could link to it and gather all information we found about that object here. It is also possible to fix the links to this planet as soon as it's officially added by using the “What links here” feature. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 15:36, 25 September 2013 (CDT)
 
I'm not sure if stuff like this should be added. It is more like a concept and then of only one developer 3 and a half months ago. But still we could link to it and gather all information we found about that object here. It is also possible to fix the links to this planet as soon as it's officially added by using the “What links here” feature. — [[User:XZise|xZise]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:XZise|talk]]&#93;</small> 15:36, 25 September 2013 (CDT)
 +
 +
== Removed a trolling message ==
 +
I removed a trolling message made by a user named Ricky. I'm not aware of any plans to add this planet in 0.24. The comment has lead to some consternation on the forums and without a citation or source it's clearly doing more harm than good.
 +
[[User:KasperVld|KasperVld]] <small>&#91;[[User talk:KasperVld|talk]]&#93;</small> 10:54 23-12-2013 (GMT)

Revision as of 10:54, 23 December 2013

Should it be kept?

I'm not sure if stuff like this should be added. It is more like a concept and then of only one developer 3 and a half months ago. But still we could link to it and gather all information we found about that object here. It is also possible to fix the links to this planet as soon as it's officially added by using the “What links here” feature. — xZise [talk] 15:36, 25 September 2013 (CDT)

Removed a trolling message

I removed a trolling message made by a user named Ricky. I'm not aware of any plans to add this planet in 0.24. The comment has lead to some consternation on the forums and without a citation or source it's clearly doing more harm than good. KasperVld [talk] 10:54 23-12-2013 (GMT)