Difference between revisions of "User:Murph/sandbox"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
(Strategies#List of Strategies for experimentation) |
(Convert fnances) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== List of Strategies == | == List of Strategies == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Finances === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{kerbal|mortimer|link=yes|75px}}<br>[[Mortimer Kerman]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== [[File:Fundraising Campaign.png|40px]] Fundraising Campaign ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can likely raise some money by exploiting the attention that we get out of new successful ventures to remind the well-to-do Kerbals out there that we could use their support, and the contents of their wallets. This is probably going to be seen as a bit cheeky of us, so be prepared to face some backlash from the public. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Effects: | ||
+ | :* Takes 5 – 100% Reputation gains | ||
+ | :* Yields 1015.084 – 1253.190 Funds for each 1 unit of Reputation | ||
+ | ; Setup Cost: | ||
+ | : {{mark|pres}}7 – {{mark|pres}}70 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== [[File:Patents Licensing.png|40px]] Patents Licensing ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our science data can be worth a lot of money by selling licenses for other organizations to use our patents. The added book-keeping required will probably add some extra work for the R&D team, but the financial benefits could be worth their reduced output. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Effects: | ||
+ | :* Takes 5 – 100% Science gains from contracts | ||
+ | :* Yields 2101.68 – 2594.578 Funds for each 1 unit of Science | ||
+ | :* Takes 5 – 100% Science gains from field work | ||
+ | :* Yields 84.064 – 103.783 Funds for each 1 unit of Science | ||
+ | ; Setup Cost: | ||
+ | : {{mark|scp}}263 – {{mark|scp}}{{Formatnum|2700}} | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 15: | Line 41: | ||
! 5% | ! 5% | ||
! 100% | ! 100% | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 01:50, 10 June 2015
Error creating thumbnail: /bin/bash: rsvg-convert: command not found |
This personal sandbox page intentionally left blank. Please do not delete, I may want something in the history. |
List of Strategies
Finances
Fundraising Campaign
We can likely raise some money by exploiting the attention that we get out of new successful ventures to remind the well-to-do Kerbals out there that we could use their support, and the contents of their wallets. This is probably going to be seen as a bit cheeky of us, so be prepared to face some backlash from the public.
- Effects
-
- Takes 5 – 100% Reputation gains
- Yields 1015.084 – 1253.190 Funds for each 1 unit of Reputation
- Setup Cost
- ★7 – ★70
Patents Licensing
Our science data can be worth a lot of money by selling licenses for other organizations to use our patents. The added book-keeping required will probably add some extra work for the R&D team, but the financial benefits could be worth their reduced output.
- Effects
-
- Takes 5 – 100% Science gains from contracts
- Yields 2101.68 – 2594.578 Funds for each 1 unit of Science
- Takes 5 – 100% Science gains from field work
- Yields 84.064 – 103.783 Funds for each 1 unit of Science
- Setup Cost
- ⚛263 – ⚛2 700
Department | Icon | Name | Set up Cost | Effects | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 100% | |||||
Science Linus Kerman |
Unpaid Research Program | ★35 | ★130 |
|
A program where undergrad researchers are given the opportunity to work in our great Space Program, to boost the science earned out of each Mit of data. The Interns don't get paid, but the prestige of working with such a grand organization as ours surely is its own reward, isn't it? | |
Outsourced R&D | 76 100 | 800 000 |
|
Why do all the data-crunching ourselves when we can contract external research labs to help us process the data we receive. These services aren't exactly cheap, but their R&D facilities are very impressive. | ||
Research Rights Sell-Out | N/A | N/A |
|
We could make a quick buck from the Science the R&D team has collected by selling exclusive research rights to the highest bidder. Yes, that means we wouldn't be able to make use of that Science ourselves, but for exclusive rights, I'm sure we could fetch a pretty penny from some large agency or conglomerate. | ||
Public Relations Walt Kerman |
Appreciation Campaign | 70 750 | 750 000 |
|
We could definitely improve our image by putting some effort into reminding Kerbals everywhere of just how great the Space Program is. Advertisement space isn't free, however. | |
Open-Source Tech Program | ⚛195 | ⚛2 000 |
|
Even though we went through great lengths to get our scientific data, making it available for free to all of Kerbalkind can only be seen as a good thing. R&D will probably not be at its peak efficiency however, with all the noise these outside opinions tend to generate. | ||
Bail-Out Grant | N/A | N/A |
|
We must be in dire straits to be considering such an option. Accepting a public grant could save us from bankruptcy, but it would also put a very serious dent in the Space Program's reputation. However, the Space Program is too big to fail, so if it's either this option or closing shop, I would advise you to accept the money. | ||
Operations Gus Kerman |
Aggressive Negotiations | ★109 | ★750 |
|
We can get better deals with our suppliers by taking up a more... assertive stance on our negotiations with them. They probably won't see this as a friendly move, but we can definitely have it our way if we press them. It's not as if we care what others think, do we? | |
Recovery Transponder Fitting | 20 250 | 120 000 |
|
Recovering parts landed far away from the Space Center can be very costly, but I reckon we can reduce those costs by installing better transponders on the parts we launch. These units are not cheap, but they should make it much easier to find parts, improving the recovery value even if they're half-way around Kerbin. What do you say? |