Difference between revisions of "User talk:XZise"

Revision as of 08:22, 23 April 2014

Archives
2013 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 2014 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 Jan
Threads older than 31 days may be archived by RoboJeb.
Edit this box

Editing Tips

Thanks for the tip, sorry it took me so long to reply! Medavox (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2014 (CDT)

I's Sorry

I'm sorry, I'm just an update, just as a joke. Confusing sorry got side.ysjbserver 05:43, 13 February 2014‎ (UTC)

For what ever reason you did that, it's “okay” (as in you won't be blocked) as it didn't broke anything and it was the only incident. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)

Notice from the original writer of the Oxygen page

I'd like to thank you for imporving upon my work, it is much appreciated. Thanks, -LiquidLight 08:38, 17 October 2013‎ (UTC)

You are welcome. I try to preserve as much as possible without annoying the original authors. — xZise [talk] 09:03, 27 March 2014 (CDT)

How old are you?

Well how old? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montana (talk • contribs) 19:08, 16 February 2014‎ (UTC)

I don't know what is happening here, but I decline here. — xZise [talk] 15:56, 16 February 2014 (CST)

planed features changes

both the massive parts and the astaroids are confermed by harvisteR in that streem, he says that astaroids will be in the main game, but other things that include the nasa pack will be separate, i will post a better link to the stream in a second. i actually took the geysers from a post on gas planet 2. also look at today's dev note it confirms everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krona (talk • contribs) 03:15, 19 February 2014‎ (UTC)

Infobox concept

Hi, I did get confused which system was the one to go for; I think I actually already changed one or two the wrong way around. So it looks like we're using Infobox/Part | data |more={{ additional items }}, right?

Very new to Wiki editing, is this the right way to respond or should I have edited your talk msg?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniu (talk • contribs) 13:19, 27 March 2014‎ (UTC)

I'm actually not sure which is the best way. I usually response below the message to have a flow for other readers. But positing on the others one talk page will notify the user.

Now actually they are transitioning to the sytem using the more parameter, because that easily allow constructs like R.A.P.I.E.R. Engine/Box where there are two different types of infoboxes (without always creating a new one every time). A little discussion is at Template talk:Infobox/Part#Rework the template?. Unfortunately not all templates can be converted yet (but liquid fuel engines and command modules should work fine).

And yes you actually reverted one of my changes, but that not a problem. I fixed that quickly (and that's one of the reasons I contacted you, so you know why I reverted your changes once).

Also the <noinclude>{{Data template used}}</noinclude> is simply to tell others that it is not a real article, which for example happend here. — xZise [talk] 08:51, 27 March 2014 (CDT)

We are creating a French fan wiki...

Hello, I am a member of the KSP-Fr French Community, and I want to ask you to do something important.

We are currently creating a French fan wiki, because nobody except me was contributing to the French section of this wiki anyway. I have already copied all the French pages of this wiki, so I want you to delete them all. I mean, all pages with /fr suffix, since we are going to paste them on another wiki, they would become useless.

Just don't delete the French tutorials, or tell before to their authors to keep a copy of their work, so we could transfer the French tutorials too.

I hope I am not asking for too much.

Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BFMauviba (talk • contribs) 16:09, 30 March 2014‎ (UTC)

Hi, currently I won't delete any French page, because I can't say easily “delete all pages which end with /fr but not begin with Tutorial”. Maybe BobBot will be able to do that, but unfortunately I forgot the password so I can use him at the moment.

But maybe there is a better solution. I hope that not a user (including me) spooked you to basically leave this wiki. Then I don't know how sensible it is to have a second wiki. Why don't bring your friends to here and try working on the articles in the official wiki. I assume you are not alone working on the French fan wiki?

And I'm not sure if it is that useful to delete all French pages, because I mean they are there.

Oh and one note (I didn't check that yet): If I'm deleting any French pages because of this request, they have to be from you. Of course it sounds like this will be the case, but for example Kerbin/fr wouldn't be deleted without the other editors consent. — xZise [talk] 09:34, 31 March 2014 (CDT)

I tried to convince the French KSP Community, but they prefer starting their own fan wiki. They say they could then talk with Squad for making the fan wiki official. By the way, I didn't have the idea for the fan wiki, but I have created a bunch of french pages on the official wiki, so I thought I could offer them. I have created the following pages:

• Kerbal Space Program/fr
• Mk1 Cockpit/fr
• Mk2 Cockpit/fr
• Mk3 Cockpit/fr
• Command Pod Mk1/fr
• Mk1-2 Command Pod/fr
• Kerbal Space Center/fr
• Kerbal/fr
• Version history/fr
• Jebediah Kerman/fr
• Bill Kerman/fr
• Bob Kerman/fr
• Gene Kerman/fr
• Wernher von Kerman/fr
• Kerbonaut/fr
• Squad/fr
• Early Versions/fr

And some rather unimportant ones. I have edited a lot the planets and moons' pages too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFMauviba (talk • contribs) 15:40, 31 March 2014‎

Calculation Tools page is done

Just bringing this to your attention, as you might have missed my last edits to that. It's ready for evaluation and inclusion at your discretion :P I don't need anything done, just making sure you know.

--MechaLynx (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2014 (CDT)

Thank you

Thank you for changing my section about Falcon heavy the site was confusing and I did my best to make the rocket similar. I am just happy that you did not delete it as what happened on another wiki... or as I do on one wiki I am a moderator for.— Preceding unsigned comment added by LABHOUSE (talk • contribs) 00:08, 22 April 2014‎ (UTC)

Simply deleting is the easy way out. Although I might delete something as adding the Falcon Heavy twice only increase maintenance. For example on the tutorial to the Salyut programme the Proton-K was referenced but with a link to the Tutorial: ISS article. Also we don't know if the Falcon Heavy will be used for the ISS, so maybe the Falcon Heavy should only be referenced in the Mars One article, and the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial. — xZise [talk] 05:09, 22 April 2014 (CDT)

Yeah, deleting is the easy way out I cannot imagine how many trolls are on here 10 come every month on a smaller wiki. Should I also but in the description that you can make a normal falcon nine rocket by making a falcon heavy without boosters? And NASA has a contract with space x to send a crew to the iss in 2016 I think and Dragon just won't make the cut I think so there is a chance for them to use the falcon heavy. It would not surprise me if space x buys the iss after nasa and esa and csa and the Russians are done with it. LABHOUSE (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2014 (CDT)

Now of course you could, and maybe should, mention that the Falcon Heavy consists of three Falcon 9 1.1 first stages and one second stage. So there could be the Falcon 9 in the ISS tutorial and you could reference the Falcon 9 from the Mars One tutorial (that the Falcon Heavy uses two additional Falcon 9 first stages).

I also don't think that a Falcon Heavy is necessary for the manned Dragon capsule, but I can't find any sources for that. — xZise [talk] 03:22, 23 April 2014 (CDT)