Difference between revisions of "Strategies"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
Kspjptrans (talk | contribs) (→List of Strategies) |
Kspjptrans (talk | contribs) (→List of Strategies) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Takes 5% Reputation gains | * Takes 5% Reputation gains | ||
* Yields 7.1 Funds for each 1 unit of Reputation | * Yields 7.1 Funds for each 1 unit of Reputation | ||
| − | | | + | | We can likely raise some money by exploiting the attention that we get out of new successful ventures to remind the well-to-do Kerbals out there that we could use their support, and the contents of their wallets. This is probably going to be seen as a bit cheeky of us, so be prepared to face some backlash from the public. |
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:]] | | [[File:]] | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Takes 5% Science gains | * Takes 5% Science gains | ||
* Yields 8.1 Funds for each 1 unit of Science | * Yields 8.1 Funds for each 1 unit of Science | ||
| − | | | + | | Our science data can be worth a lot of money by selling licenses for other organizations to use our patents. The added book-keeping required will probably add some extra work for the R&D team, but the financial benefits could be worth their reduced output. |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Takes 5% Reputation gains | * Takes 5% Reputation gains | ||
* Yields 1 Science for each 1.65 Reputation | * Yields 1 Science for each 1.65 Reputation | ||
| − | | | + | | A program where undergrad researchers are given the opportunity to work in our great Space Program, to boost the science earned out of each mit of data. The Interns don't get paid, but the prestige of working with such a grand organization as ours surely is its own reward, isn't it? |
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:]] | | [[File:]] | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* Takes 5% Fund Income | * Takes 5% Fund Income | ||
* Yields 1 Science for each 35.557 Funds | * Yields 1 Science for each 35.557 Funds | ||
| − | | | + | | Why do all the data-crunching ourselves when we can contract external research labs to help us process the data we receive. These services aren't exactly cheap, but their R&D facilities are very impressive. |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
* Takes 5% Funds Income | * Takes 5% Funds Income | ||
* Yields 1 Reptation for each 23.706 Funds | * Yields 1 Reptation for each 23.706 Funds | ||
| − | | | + | | We could definitely improve our image by putting some effort into reminding Kerbals everywhere of just how great the Space Program is. Advertisement space isn't free, however. |
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:]] | | [[File:]] | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
* Takes 5% Science gains | * Takes 5% Science gains | ||
* Yields 1.115 Reputation for each 1 unit of Science | * Yields 1.115 Reputation for each 1 unit of Science | ||
| − | | | + | | Even though we went through great lengths to get our scientific data, making it available for free to all of Kerbalkind can only be seen as a good thing. R&D will probably not be at its peak efficiency however, with all the noise these outside opinions tend to generate. |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
* -6.75% Funds off on Launch Costs and R&D Purchases | * -6.75% Funds off on Launch Costs and R&D Purchases | ||
* -27.0 Reputation on each discount | * -27.0 Reputation on each discount | ||
| − | | | + | | We can get better deals with our suppliers by taking up a more... assertive stance on our negotiations with them. They probably won't see this as a friendly move, but we can definately have it our way if we press them. It's not as if we care what others think, do we? |
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:]] | | [[File:]] | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 8 October 2014
List of Strategies
| Department | Icon | Name | Set up Cost | Effects | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 100% | |||||
| Finances | [[File:]] | Fundraising Campaign | 49 | 500 |
|
We can likely raise some money by exploiting the attention that we get out of new successful ventures to remind the well-to-do Kerbals out there that we could use their support, and the contents of their wallets. This is probably going to be seen as a bit cheeky of us, so be prepared to face some backlash from the public. |
| [[File:]] | Patents Licensing | 263 | 2700 |
|
Our science data can be worth a lot of money by selling licenses for other organizations to use our patents. The added book-keeping required will probably add some extra work for the R&D team, but the financial benefits could be worth their reduced output. | |
| Science | [[File:]] | Unpaid Research Program | 288 |
|
A program where undergrad researchers are given the opportunity to work in our great Space Program, to boost the science earned out of each mit of data. The Interns don't get paid, but the prestige of working with such a grand organization as ours surely is its own reward, isn't it? | |
| [[File:]] | Outsourced R&D | 16243 |
|
Why do all the data-crunching ourselves when we can contract external research labs to help us process the data we receive. These services aren't exactly cheap, but their R&D facilities are very impressive. | ||
| Public Relations | [[File:]] | Appreciation Campaign | 15600 |
|
We could definitely improve our image by putting some effort into reminding Kerbals everywhere of just how great the Space Program is. Advertisement space isn't free, however. | |
| [[File:]] | Open-Source Tech Program | 195 |
|
Even though we went through great lengths to get our scientific data, making it available for free to all of Kerbalkind can only be seen as a good thing. R&D will probably not be at its peak efficiency however, with all the noise these outside opinions tend to generate. | ||
| Operations | [[File:]] | Aggressive Negotiations | 109 |
|
We can get better deals with our suppliers by taking up a more... assertive stance on our negotiations with them. They probably won't see this as a friendly move, but we can definately have it our way if we press them. It's not as if we care what others think, do we? | |
| [[File:]] | Recovery Transponder Fitting | 20250 |
|
dscr | ||
