User talk:XZise

Mk2 Fuselage Short page mixed up

The "box" part of the Mk2 Fuselage Short page shows stats of the LF+O tank. I am sorry that when I copied the text over from the Mk2 LF+O short page to the jet fuel fuselage short page, I forgot to change the body text. Could you please create a new box for the Mk2 Fuselage small stats? (cause I don't know how to do it)—Deepspacecreeper (talk • contribs) 6:12 October 29, 2014 (PDT)

Hi Deepspacecreeper. That is not a problem but just a some information so you might be able to solve that yourself in the future. First of all I messed it up and have chosen the wrong template.

But that is beside the point. So! Most infoboxes are in Page title/Box so Mk2 Liquid Fuel Fuselage Short/Box in this case. Now on the left you see a few links and there is also “Data templates” if you expand that you see always an Infobox entry if there is already an infobox created.

The infobox actually is manually included by adding {{:Page title/Box}} at the very beginning (if there are other boxes like {{Stub}} you can also add it below those but there is no real rule how it has to be done). So to fix it someone (in this case me) just needs to fix the link. — xZise [talk] 21:00, 29 October 2014 (CDT)

Hi again, just 1 more problem to address, the picture is also mixed up for the mk2 small Lf&O and jet fuel tanks. the one for the Lf&O has a grey streak and the jet fuel tank doesn't have one.

Also I don't know how to add the page for the new stock craft Learstar A1 and Stearwing D45 into Category: Stock craft. I created pages for the new stock craft and need help updating the stock craft page too. —Deepspacecreeper 06:45 October 28 (PDT)

If you find any pages (including images) with the wrong names use {{move}} to also mark the target page. As I currently haven't much time I'll move them later when I know what I need to do. About your other problem: I'm not sure what you are trying to do. If you want to add a page to a category (e.g. Category:Stock craft) just add [[Category:Stock craft]]|. The colons (which you only will see when you edit the page) in the link before (in the parenthesis), in front of Category are there to prevent that this page is added to the category. If you add that link (usually at the end of a page) it'll automatically add the page to the category. And it appears you have been able to add the craft to stock craft. Or did you mean {{stock craft}}? — xZise [talk] 14:47, 30 October 2014 (CDT)

That was what I meant. Thanks for the advice! Deepspacecreeper 19:42, 30 October 2014 (PDT)

planed features changes

both the massive parts and the astaroids are confermed by harvisteR in that streem, he says that astaroids will be in the main game, but other things that include the nasa pack will be separate, i will post a better link to the stream in a second. i actually took the geysers from a post on gas planet 2. also look at today's dev note it confirms everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krona (talk • contribs) 03:15, 19 February 2014‎ (UTC)

Kerbal | Gender Kerbalizer Citation

Thanks for correcting this citation, it was my mistake. I was editing another link and I guess I didn't clear my clipboard. --SAMM (talk) 13:02, 29 September 2014 (CDT)

No worries :) I appreciate especially the citations in planned features. — xZise [talk] 14:18, 29 September 2014 (CDT)

I'm sorry, but I would like to edit the return request

The translation of the documents Tutorials/ko to change any user placed a mess (in front of the Cabinet should override the default translation agreements) I want you back to my last edit. thank you. Ysjbserver (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2014 (CDT)

I would appreciate an additional, temporary protection can do the editing, read the translated agreement until he (User:Kerbal.pseudo.logos) is. John'm a crisis now spoil the translation of all documents. The said request was blocked, but I herd that I think is better than giving doeseo make a protection to all documents in the ko. sorry. Ysjbserver (talk) 08:07, 10 October 2014 (CDT)

I'm sorry, maybe it's to late but I don't understand what you mean. If you want to revert/undo something (for example because you made a mistake) you can do that via the page history (it's the most left tab). (There is probably also an explanation about this on the Wikipedia)

If it's about all the pages you marked for deletion, I understand all those which use Korean symbols instead of the English alphabet. But why delete a page like Tutorial:Game Manual/ko and not fix it? — xZise [talk] 21:17, 10 October 2014 (CDT)

I've tried to undo themselves that collisions were intermediate editing, a Korean translation of basic agreement 'gyeongeoche(경어체) use (gyeongeoche of Korean' editing method. Distinctive oriental area ... did that). But will try to ruin the entire Korean translation without the use of the user continues to gyeongeoche to the tombstone.

Why does not fix, and gave it back to the better judgment of translation from the first fixing the amount of translation and too many more mistakes.

So now it is like the user to comply with the agreed requirements, but no more, I want you to link to Korean redirect deleted. Also strange that he made ​​a special character and I also have a typo ... I'm sorry to bother you. Ysjbserver (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2014 (CDT)

Okay I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to tell me. I've contacted Sunbase so maybe (s)he can help translate it. — xZise [talk] 05:12, 11 October 2014 (CDT)

Interwiki table - KSP-fr wiki

Hi xZise,
Can you add a new row in the interwiki table ?

Prefix

kspfrw

URL

http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.fr/index.php/$1

Thank you in advance,
— Mowaw_[talk], October 15, 2014 (14:23)

Template KSC

Hi xZise,
Can I add a new template named "KSC" ?
You can see an example on the KSP-fr wiki. Regards,
— Mowaw (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2014 (CDT)

Hmm, I think there is a way to link parts of an image, so we could use a complete map and when a user is roughly clicking where the VAB is it'll open it. But I can't find the documentation for that. — xZise [talk] 21:00, 22 October 2014 (CDT)

Good idea ! I think we can superimpose <div> like that: