Difference between revisions of "Fuel tank"
(+comparison table;) |
(→Rocket fuel tanks: +mass rations;) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Rocket fuel tanks === | === Rocket fuel tanks === | ||
These tanks contain both liquid fuel and oxidizer and are designed for use with rocket engines. They can also be used for jet engines, however [[#Fuselage fuel tanks|fuselage fuel tanks]] should be used, because they don't contain oxidizer, which is not used by jet engines. The oxidizer/liquid fuel ratio is exact except for the [[Oscar-B Fuel Tank]]. | These tanks contain both liquid fuel and oxidizer and are designed for use with rocket engines. They can also be used for jet engines, however [[#Fuselage fuel tanks|fuselage fuel tanks]] should be used, because they don't contain oxidizer, which is not used by jet engines. The oxidizer/liquid fuel ratio is exact except for the [[Oscar-B Fuel Tank]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Their mass fully fuelled with liquid fuel and oxidizer is between 5.245 and 9 times higher than the dry mass. The FL-T and Rockomax tanks have all the highest factor with 9 times. Second are the Kerbodyne extra large tanks which have a wet mass 8.2 higher than the dry mass. The ROUND-8 Torodial Fuel Tank has a relatively low factor of only 5.44 times the dry mass and the Oscar-B Fuel Tank is the most inefficient with a mass factor of 5.245. The combined fuel and oxidizer mass compared to the dry mass is the factor reduced by one. Thus the mass of the contents in a FL-T or Rockomax tank is 8 times higher than the dry mass. | ||
{{Stats Table Liquid Fuel Tanks}} | {{Stats Table Liquid Fuel Tanks}} |
Revision as of 16:31, 9 July 2014
A liquid fuel tank holds liquid fuel and sometimes oxidizer. Liquid fuel is required for both rocket engines and jet engines, whereas oxidizer is only used by rocket engines.
Contents
Overview
A liquid fuel tank can provide fuel to any engine directly attached to it. When tanks are directly connected together in a stack they will feed their contents from the top to the bottom of the stack. It is possible to mount additional fuel tanks radially with or without decouplers, and to transfer their contents to a central tank using fuel lines. This can be used to construct an asparagus staging system where outer tanks are drained first and dropped once empty, while still keeping the central tank full. This can be tricky to construct when dealing with very large rockets as the rocket engines of the outer layers have to be kept running long enough to ensure the rest of the rocket can get into orbit once they have stopped providing thrust.
Real world application
In real spacecraft, the liquid fuel is usually highly refined kerosene for the first stage and/or liquid hydrogen (LH2) for subsequent stages, and the oxidizer is usually liquid oxygen (LOX). Both the fuel and oxidizer are stored under slight pressure in special fuel tanks to keep them from vaporizing; this is because LH2 and LOX require temperatures below 20.28 K (−252.87 °C, −423.17 °F) and 90.19 K (−182.96 °C, −297.33 °F) respectively to remain in a liquid state. In comparison, jet aircraft carry only liquid fuel, as jet engines can rely solely on atmospheric oxygen as oxidizer. Most jet engines operate using a refined kerosene hydro-carbon, similar to diesel, which can actually be used in some diesel engines. However, it is not recommended, or legal in some places, to use jet fuel as a replacement for diesel due to its high lead content and lesser lubricating ability.
Tanks
Rocket fuel tanks
These tanks contain both liquid fuel and oxidizer and are designed for use with rocket engines. They can also be used for jet engines, however fuselage fuel tanks should be used, because they don't contain oxidizer, which is not used by jet engines. The oxidizer/liquid fuel ratio is exact except for the Oscar-B Fuel Tank.
Their mass fully fuelled with liquid fuel and oxidizer is between 5.245 and 9 times higher than the dry mass. The FL-T and Rockomax tanks have all the highest factor with 9 times. Second are the Kerbodyne extra large tanks which have a wet mass 8.2 higher than the dry mass. The ROUND-8 Torodial Fuel Tank has a relatively low factor of only 5.44 times the dry mass and the Oscar-B Fuel Tank is the most inefficient with a mass factor of 5.245. The combined fuel and oxidizer mass compared to the dry mass is the factor reduced by one. Thus the mass of the contents in a FL-T or Rockomax tank is 8 times higher than the dry mass.
Liquid fuel and oxidizer density are both 5 kg/unit | Mass (t) |
Liquid Fuel () |
Oxidizer () | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image | Part | Radial size | Cost () |
Full | Empty | Max. Temp. (K) |
Tolerance (m/s) |
Tolerance (g) | ||
R-4 'Dumpling' External Tank | X | 50 (39.90) |
0.1238 | 0.0138 | 2 000 | 5 | 50 | 9.9 | 12.1 | |
R-11 'Baguette' External Tank | X | 50 (25.21) |
0.3038 | 0.0338 | 2 000 | 5 | 50 | 24.3 | 29.7 | |
R-12 'Doughnut' External Tank | Small | 147 (119.46) |
0.3375 | 0.0375 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 27 | 33 | |
Oscar-B Fuel Tank | Tiny | 70 (51.64) |
0.225 | 0.025 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 18 | 22 | |
FL-T100 Fuel Tank | Small | 150 (104.1) |
0.5625 | 0.0625 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 45 | 55 | |
FL-T200 Fuel Tank | Small | 275 (183.2) |
1.125 | 0.125 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 90 | 110 | |
FL-T400 Fuel Tank | Small | 500 (316.4) |
2.25 | 0.25 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 180 | 220 | |
FL-T800 Fuel Tank | Small | 800 (432.8) |
4.5 | 0.5 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Rockomax X200-8 Fuel Tank | Large | 800 (432.8) |
4.5 | 0.5 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Rockomax X200-16 Fuel Tank | Large | 1 550 (815.6) |
9 | 1 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 720 | 880 | |
Rockomax X200-32 Fuel Tank | Large | 3 000 (1 531.2) |
18 | 2 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 1 440 | 1 760 | |
Rockomax Jumbo-64 Fuel Tank | Large | 5 750 (2 812.4) |
36 | 4 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 2 880 | 3 520 | |
Kerbodyne S3-3600 Tank | Extra large | 3 250 (1 597.6) |
20.25 | 2.25 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 1 620 | 1 980 | |
Kerbodyne S3-7200 Tank | Extra large | 6 500 (3 195.2) |
40.5 | 4.5 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 3 240 | 3 960 | |
Kerbodyne S3-14400 Tank | Extra large | 13 000 (6 390.4) |
81 | 9 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 6 480 | 7 920 | |
Mk2 Rocket Fuel Fuselage Short | Mk2 | 750 (566.4) |
2.29 | 0.29 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 180 | 220 | |
Mk2 Rocket Fuel Fuselage | Mk2 | 1 450 (1 082.8) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Mk3 Rocket Fuel Fuselage Short | Mk3 | 2 500 (1 352.5) |
14.29 | 1.79 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 1 125 | 1 375 | |
Mk3 Rocket Fuel Fuselage | Mk3 | 5 000 (2 705) |
28.57 | 3.57 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 2 250 | 2 750 | |
Mk3 Rocket Fuel Fuselage Long | Mk3 | 10 000 (5 410) |
57.14 | 7.14 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 4 500 | 5 500 | |
C7 Brand Adapter - 2.5m to 1.25m | Small, Large | 800 (433.0) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 300 | 20 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
C7 Brand Adapter Slanted - 2.5m to 1.25m | Small, Large | 800 (433.0) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 300 | 20 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Mk2 to 1.25m Adapter | Small, Mk2 | 550 (366.4) |
2.29 | 0.29 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 180 | 220 | |
Mk2 to 1.25m Adapter Long | Small, Mk2 | 1 050 (682.8) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Mk2 Bicoupler | Small, Mk2 x 2 | 860 (676.4) |
2.29 | 0.29 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 180 | 220 | |
2.5m to Mk2 Adapter | Large, Mk2 | 800 (432.8) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 360 | 440 | |
Mk3 to Mk2 Adapter | Mk2, Mk3 | 2 200 (1 282.0) |
11.43 | 1.43 | 2 600 | 50 | 50 | 900 | 1 100 | |
Mk3 to 2.5m Adapter | Large, Mk3 | 2 500 (1 353.0) |
14.29 | 1.79 | 2 600 | 50 | 50 | 1 125 | 1 375 | |
Mk3 to 2.5m Adapter Slanted | Large, Mk3 | 2 500 (1 353.0) |
14.29 | 1.79 | 2 600 | 50 | 50 | 1 125 | 1 375 | |
Mk3 to 3.75m Adapter | Extra large, Mk3 | 2 500 (1 353.0) |
14.29 | 1.79 | 2 600 | 50 | 50 | 1 125 | 1 375 | |
Kerbodyne ADTP-2-3 | Large, Extra large | 1 623 (246.0) |
16.88 | 1.88 | 2 000 | 6 | 50 | 1 350 | 1 650 |
Jet fuel fuselages
Fuselage tanks can only be used with jet engines, as they don't contain the oxidizer required to operate rocket engines.
Liquid Fuel Density is 5 kg/unit | Mass (t) |
Liquid Fuel () | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image | Part | Radial size | Cost () |
Full | Empty | Max. Temp. (K) |
Tolerance (m/s) |
Tolerance (g) | |
Engine Nacelle[Note 1] | Small | 600 (480) |
0.925 | 0.15 | 2 000 | 10 | 50 | 150 | |
Engine Pre-cooler[Note 1] | Small | 1 650 (1 618) |
0.375 | 0.15 | 2 000 | 10 | 50 | 40 | |
Mk1 Diverterless Supersonic Intake[Note 1] | Small | 720 (560) |
1.18 | 0.17 | 2 000 | 10 | 50 | 200 | |
Mk0 Liquid Fuel Fuselage | Tiny | 200 (160) |
0.275 | 0.025 | 2 000 | 10 | 50 | 50 | |
Mk1 Liquid Fuel Fuselage | Small | 550 (230) |
2.25 | 0.25 | 2 000 | 10 | 50 | 400 | |
Mk2 Liquid Fuel Fuselage Short | Mk2 | 750 (430) |
2.29 | 0.29 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 400 | |
Mk2 Liquid Fuel Fuselage | Mk2 | 1 450 (810) |
4.57 | 0.57 | 2 500 | 50 | 50 | 800 | |
Mk3 Liquid Fuel Fuselage Short | Mk3 | 4 300 (2 300) |
14.29 | 1.79 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 2 500 | |
Mk3 Liquid Fuel Fuselage | Mk3 | 8 600 (4 600) |
28.57 | 3.57 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 5 000 | |
Mk3 Liquid Fuel Fuselage Long | Mk3 | 17 200 (9 200) |
57.14 | 7.14 | 2 700 | 50 | 50 | 10 000 | |
NCS Adapter | Small, Tiny | 320 (256) |
0.5 | 0.1 | 2 400 | 10 | 50 | 80 | |
FAT-455 Aeroplane Main Wing[Note 2] | X | 2 800 (2 320) |
3.78 | 0.78 | 1 200 | 15 | 50 | 600 | |
Big-S Wing Strake[Note 2] | X | 1 000 (920) |
0.6 | 0.1 | 2 400 | 15 | 50 | 100 | |
Big-S Delta Wing[Note 2] | X | 3 000 (2 760) |
2.0 | 0.5 | 2 400 | 15 | 50 | 300 |
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 The Engine Nacelle, Engine Pre-cooler, and Mk1 Diverterless Supersonic Intake are a combination of air intake and liquid fuel tank. Only the tank properties are shown. They are located in the "Aerodynamic" category in the game.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 The FAT-455 Aeroplane Main Wing, Big-S Wing Strake, and Big-S Delta Wing are a combination of lifting surface and liquid fuel tank. Only the tank properties are shown. They are located in the "Aerodynamic" category in the game.
Modder's resource
The fuel/dry/full mass of dedicated fuel tanks are associated with the following formulas. This assume that the game values are given in liters (1 L = 1 dm³ = 0.001 m³) and metric tons (1 t = 1 Mg = 1000 kg).
Take the Rockomax X200-16 Fuel Tank for example. Based on some rough in-game measurements it is approximately 0.67 meters tall with a radius of 1 meter. This would give the tank/stage a real world volume of around 2094.4 liters (2.0944 m³). Dividing the tank's actual in-game fuel capacity (0.72 m³ + 0.88 m³ = 1.6 m³) by its total volume we can find what percentage of the volume is used for fuel, around 76.39%, very close to the roughly 80% for the Saturn V's stages. The reason the entire volume is not used is because the actual fuel tank is a pressure vessel with rounded ends inside the cylindrical stage.
Comparison
The table does only contain tanks, which contain both liquid fuel and oxidizer. The height is units, where one unit is the height of the FL-T100 Fuel Tank.
Height (units) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small | FL-T100 Fuel Tank | FL-T200 Fuel Tank | FL-T400 Fuel Tank | FL-T800 Fuel Tank | — |
Large | — | Rockomax X200-8 Fuel Tank | Rockomax X200-16 Fuel Tank | Rockomax X200-32 Fuel Tank | Rockomax Jumbo-64 Fuel Tank |
Extra large | — | — | Kerbodyne S3-3600 Tank | Kerbodyne S3-7200 Tank | Kerbodyne S3-14400 Tank |
Notes
- Before v0.18 all fuel tanks provided fuel for both rocket engines and jet engines, because there was only one type of fuel recognized in game.
- Since v0.18 fuselages cannot be used to power rocket engines anymore, as they don't contain the necessary oxidizer.
- RCS uses monopropellant fuel that is stored in different tanks.
See also
- Reaction engine
- Jet engine
- Liquid fuel
- Oxidizer
- Liquid hydrogen on Wikipedia
- Liquid oxygen on Wikipedia
- RP-1 on Wikipedia