Difference between revisions of "TVR-2160C Mk2 Stack Quad-Coupler"
From Kerbal Space Program Wiki
m (-removed author for description; *updated 1 description title;) |
UmbralRaptor (talk | contribs) (*rephrasing, +a bit about drag.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:TVR-2160C Mk2 Stack Quad-Coupler/Box}} | {{:TVR-2160C Mk2 Stack Quad-Coupler/Box}} | ||
{{Stub||}} | {{Stub||}} | ||
− | The '''TVR-2160C Stack Quad Coupler''' is an adapter that was added in version 0.21 in KSP. The Quad Coupler is useful in | + | The '''TVR-2160C Stack Quad Coupler''' is an adapter that was added in version 0.21 in KSP. The Quad Coupler is useful in some ways, having more nodes then any other adapter (For now). |
+ | |||
+ | The quadcoupler has non-standard (0.3 instead of 0.2) drag, meaning it should be placed behind the center of mass to ensure stability. Given its intended function, this can be problematic. | ||
== Product description == | == Product description == | ||
− | {{Quote| | + | {{Quote|What could be more awesome than a Tricoupler? Why, a quadcoupler, of course. Just remember that it is not a decoupler, and will not separate stages.}} |
+ | |||
== Changes == | == Changes == | ||
;{{Version|0.21|}} | ;{{Version|0.21|}} |
Revision as of 15:23, 24 September 2014
TVR-2160C Mk2 Stack Quad-Coupler | ||
Adapter by O.M.B. Demolition Enterprises | ||
Radial size | Small | |
Cost | (total) | 2 000.00 ![]() |
Mass | (total) | 0.175 t |
Drag | 0.3 | |
Max. Temp. | 2000 K | |
Impact Tolerance | 12 m/s | |
Research | ![]() | |
Unlock cost | 4 200 ![]() | |
Since version | 0.21 | |
Part configuration | stackQuadCoupler.cfg | |
Packed volume | None |
The TVR-2160C Stack Quad Coupler is an adapter that was added in version 0.21 in KSP. The Quad Coupler is useful in some ways, having more nodes then any other adapter (For now).
The quadcoupler has non-standard (0.3 instead of 0.2) drag, meaning it should be placed behind the center of mass to ensure stability. Given its intended function, this can be problematic.
Product description
“ | What could be more awesome than a Tricoupler? Why, a quadcoupler, of course. Just remember that it is not a decoupler, and will not separate stages. | ” |
Changes
- Initial release
|