Difference between revisions of "Reaction engine"
m (→Solid fuel rocket engines: !link to solid rocket booster;) |
(+ion engine; +RCS thrusters; *moved text into their designated sections; +physical principle;) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Image:LV-T30_Liquid_Fuel_Engine.jpg|right|thumb|[[LV-T30 Liquid Fuel Engine]]]] | [[Image:LV-T30_Liquid_Fuel_Engine.jpg|right|thumb|[[LV-T30 Liquid Fuel Engine]]]] | ||
− | A '''rocket engine''' is an engine that uses nothing but its onboard propellant to generate thrust. Unlike traditional air breathing | + | A '''rocket engine''' is an [[engine]] that uses nothing but its onboard propellant to generate thrust. Unlike traditional air breathing [[jet engine]]s rocket engines are able to function where no oxygen is present. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Approaches to rocket engines == | == Approaches to rocket engines == | ||
+ | All rocket engine work with the same principle: They propel mass out of nozzles and accelerate because of Newton's third law of motion. The difference to jet engines is that they don't need a surrounding atmosphere. They also don't need any surface which allows them to be used everywhere. | ||
− | + | There are four different types available in the game which all use this basic principle. Apart from RCS thrusters their controls are the same. | |
− | |||
− | |||
== Solid fuel rocket engines == | == Solid fuel rocket engines == | ||
:→ Main article: [[Solid rocket booster]] | :→ Main article: [[Solid rocket booster]] | ||
+ | The most ancient type is a [[solid fuel]] rocket which is as simple as igniting a solid, self-oxidizing compound or mixture within the casing of the rocket and allowing the escaping gases to be released through a nozzle at the rear. | ||
+ | |||
=== Advantages === | === Advantages === | ||
Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
== Liquid fuel rocket engines == | == Liquid fuel rocket engines == | ||
+ | Liquid fuel engines are powered by a liquid propellant which is comprised of combustible [[liquid fuel]] and [[oxidizer]]. In the real world typical liquid fuels are often liquid hydrogen or kerosene, and typical oxidizers are liquid oxygen or nitrous-oxide. All engines use [[w:Bell nozzle|Bell nozzles]] except the only [[w:Aerospike engine|aerospike engine]]. | ||
+ | |||
=== Advantages === | === Advantages === | ||
Line 48: | Line 45: | ||
* Complex design with fuel tanks and other additional components. | * Complex design with fuel tanks and other additional components. | ||
* More points of possible failure such as if the parts tear apart from stress. | * More points of possible failure such as if the parts tear apart from stress. | ||
− | |||
{{FlipBox | {{FlipBox | ||
|title=Available liquid fuel rocket engines | |title=Available liquid fuel rocket engines | ||
|content={{Stats Table Liquid Fuel Engines}} | |content={{Stats Table Liquid Fuel Engines}} | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Ion engines == | ||
+ | There is a new third form called ion engine which uses ionized atoms, [[xenon gas]], and accelerate them in a electro-magnetic field. This type of engine is very efficient but has a very low thrust making it only suitable for probes already in space. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Advantages === | ||
+ | * A very high specific impulse. | ||
+ | * The [[xenon gas]] can be moved between tanks, which means that spacecraft with ion engines and tanks are easier and more resource-efficient to refuel than vessels with solid fuel engines, which required the entire engine bay to be replaced, while xenon gas can quickly be moved between two docked vessels. | ||
+ | * The fuel doesn't need to be moved as xenon gas is used evenly. | ||
+ | * Modular design: fuel and other components can be stored elsewhere in the craft. | ||
+ | * Throttle can be adjusted depending on thrust requirements. | ||
+ | * Can be switched off and re-ignited at will. | ||
+ | === Disadvantages === | ||
+ | * Very low thrust so it is impossible to lift off with ion engines only. | ||
+ | * No thrust vectoring is available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{FlipBox | ||
+ | |title=Available ion engine parts | ||
+ | |content={{Stats Table Xenon}} | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == RCS thrusters == | ||
+ | The [[RCS]] thrusters are allowing an craft to change the attitude, because their thrust is low allowing tiny changes in velocity. Usually it isn't used as a main engine because the specific impulse is lower than any other liquid fuel engine. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Advantages === | ||
+ | * The [[monopropellant]] can be moved between tanks, which means that spacecraft with RCS thrusters and tanks are easier and more resource-efficient to refuel than vessels with solid fuel engines, which required the entire engine bay to be replaced, while xenon gas can quickly be moved between two docked vessels. | ||
+ | * The fuel doesn't need to be moved as monopropellant is used evenly. | ||
+ | * Modular design: fuel and other components can be stored elsewhere in the craft. | ||
+ | * Can be switched off and re-ignited at will. | ||
+ | === Disadvantages === | ||
+ | * Very low thrust so it is impossible to lift off with ion engines only. | ||
+ | * No thrust vectoring is available. | ||
+ | * The user can only switch engines on or off, while the SAS can run them on different thrust levels in between. | ||
+ | * The specific impulse is, especially in atmosphere, low and comparable with solid rocket engines. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{FlipBox | ||
+ | |title=Available RCS engines | ||
+ | |content={{Stats Table RCS Thrusters}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Parts}} | {{Parts}} | ||
+ | [[Category:Engine]] |
Revision as of 18:17, 5 July 2013
A rocket engine is an engine that uses nothing but its onboard propellant to generate thrust. Unlike traditional air breathing jet engines rocket engines are able to function where no oxygen is present.
Contents
Approaches to rocket engines
All rocket engine work with the same principle: They propel mass out of nozzles and accelerate because of Newton's third law of motion. The difference to jet engines is that they don't need a surrounding atmosphere. They also don't need any surface which allows them to be used everywhere.
There are four different types available in the game which all use this basic principle. Apart from RCS thrusters their controls are the same.
Solid fuel rocket engines
- → Main article: Solid rocket booster
The most ancient type is a solid fuel rocket which is as simple as igniting a solid, self-oxidizing compound or mixture within the casing of the rocket and allowing the escaping gases to be released through a nozzle at the rear.
Advantages
- Have a very high thrust to weight ratio.
- Engine and fuel tank are combined in one part, lowering part count, simplifying design and improving stability, which is especially important in the early stages of a rocket launch from the surface of a planet where large ammounts of more or less heavy parts and high-powered rockets cause stress both to the vessel itself and the player's computer.
Disadvantages
- Monolithic design, must be built in one piece.
- Cannot be throttled or switched off after ignition.
- Once spent, they are unable to use fuel from another source of the craft.
Solid Fuel Density is 7.5 kg/unit | Mass (t) |
Fuel () |
Thrust (kN) |
TWR | Isp (s) | Burn (s) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full | Empty | |||||||||||||||||
Image | Part | Radial size | Cost () |
Full | Empty | Max. Temp. (K) |
Tolerance (m/s) |
Tolerance (g) |
atm | vac | atm | vac | atm | vac | atm | vac | ||
RT-5 "Flea" Solid Fuel Booster | Small, Radial mounted | 200 (116) |
1.50 | 0.45 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 140 | 162.91 | 192.0 | 11.07 | 13.05 | 36.92 | 43.51 | 140 | 165 | 8.8 | |
RT-10 "Hammer" Solid Fuel Booster | Small, Radial mounted | 400 (175) |
3.56 | 0.75 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 375 | 197.90 | 227.0 | 5.66 | 6.50 | 26.91 | 30.86 | 170 | 195 | 23.7 | |
BACC "Thumper" Solid Fuel Booster | Small, Radial mounted | 850 (358) |
7.65 | 1.50 | 2 200 | 7 | 50 | 820 | 250.00 | 300.0 | 3.33 | 4.00 | 17.00 | 20.39 | 175 | 210 | 42.2 | |
S1 SRB-KD25k "Kickback" Solid Fuel Booster | Small, Radial mounted | 2 700 (1 140) |
24.00 | 4.50 | 2 200 | 7 | 50 | 2 600 | 593.86 | 670.0 | 2.52 | 2.85 | 13.46 | 15.18 | 195 | 220 | 62.8 | |
Sepratron I | Radial mounted | 75 (70.2) |
0.0725 | 0.0125 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 8 | 13.79 | 18.0 | 19.40 | 25.32 | 112.51 | 146.84 | 118 | 154 | 5.0 | |
FM1 "Mite" Solid Fuel Booster | Tiny, Radial mounted | 75 (51.0) |
0.375 | 0.075 | 2 200 | 7 | 50 | 40 | 11.012 | 12.5 | 2.93 | 3.33 | 14.68 | 16.66 | 185 | 210 | 49.44 | |
F3S0 "Shrimp" Solid Fuel Booster | Tiny, Radial mounted | 150 (96.0) |
0.875 | 0.155 | 2 200 | 7 | 50 | 90 | 26.512 | 30.0 | 3.22 | 3.65 | 17.1 | 19.35 | 190 | 215 | 47.44 | |
S2-17 "Thoroughbred" Solid Fuel Booster | Large, Radial mounted | 9 000 (4 200.0) |
70.00 | 10.00 | 2 200 | 10 | 50 | 8 000 | 1 515.217 | 1 700.0 | 2.16 | 2.43 | 15.15 | 17.0 | 205 | 230 | 79.6 | |
S2-33 "Clydesdale" Solid Fuel Booster | Large, Radial mounted | 18 500 (8 660.0) |
144.00 | 21.00 | 2 200 | 10 | 50 | 16 400 | 2 948.936 | 3 300.0 | 2.05 | 2.29 | 14.04 | 15.71 | 210 | 235 | 85.9 |
Liquid fuel rocket engines
Liquid fuel engines are powered by a liquid propellant which is comprised of combustible liquid fuel and oxidizer. In the real world typical liquid fuels are often liquid hydrogen or kerosene, and typical oxidizers are liquid oxygen or nitrous-oxide. All engines use Bell nozzles except the only aerospike engine.
Advantages
- Fuel and oxidizer can be moved between liquid fuel tanks, which means that spacecraft with liquid fuel engines and fuel tanks are easier and more resource-efficient to refuel than vessels with solid fuel engines, which required the entire engine bay to be replaced, while liquid fuel and oxidizer can quickly be moved between two docked vessels.
- Modular design: fuel and other components can be stored elsewhere in the craft.
- Throttle can be adjusted depending on thrust requirements.
- Can be switched off and re-ignited at will.
- Many nozzles can be gimballed for thrust vectoring.
- Efficiency largely dependent on design, with large variations. For early stages, high-output engines with low fuel-efficiency can be used to reach a low Kerbin orbit, while extremely efficient but low-power engines should be used for travelling between planets and moons to save fuel and extend the range of the craft.
Disadvantages
- Lower power to weight ratio compared to solid rocket engines.
- Complex design with fuel tanks and other additional components.
- More points of possible failure such as if the parts tear apart from stress.
Thrust (kN) |
T/W ratio |
Max. Fuel Consumption (/s) |
Isp (s) | TVC | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image | Part | Radial size | Cost () |
Mass (t) |
Max. Temp. (K) |
Tolerance (m/s) |
Tolerance (g) |
atm | vac | atm | vac | atm | vac | Gimbal (°) | |
LV-1R "Spider" Liquid Fuel Engine | Radial mounted | 120 | 0.02 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 1.79 | 2.0 | 9.14 | 10.20 | 0.141 | 260 | 290 | 10.0 | |
24-77 "Twitch" Liquid Fuel Engine | Radial mounted | 230 | 0.08 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 15.17 | 16.0 | 19.34 | 20.39 | 1.125 | 275 | 290 | 8.0 | |
Mk-55 "Thud" Liquid Fuel Engine | Radial mounted | 820 | 0.90 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 108.20 | 120.0 | 12.26 | 13.60 | 8.024 | 275 | 305 | 8.0 | |
O-10 "Puff" MonoPropellant Fuel Engine[Note 1] | Radial mounted | 150 | 0.09 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 9.60 | 20.0 | 10.88 | 22.66 | 2.039 | 120 | 250 | 6.0 | |
LV-1 "Ant" Liquid Fuel Engine | Tiny, Radial mounted | 110 | 0.02 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 0.51 | 2.0 | 2.59 | 10.20 | 0.129 | 80 | 315 | — | |
48-7S "Spark" Liquid Fuel Engine | Tiny | 240 | 0.13 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 16.56 | 20.0 | 12.99 | 15.69 | 1.275 | 265 | 320 | 3.0 | |
LV-909 "Terrier" Liquid Fuel Engine | Small | 390 | 0.50 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 14.78 | 60.0 | 3.01 | 12.24 | 3.547 | 85 | 345 | 4.0 | |
LV-T30 "Reliant" Liquid Fuel Engine | Small | 1 100 | 1.25 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 205.16 | 240.0 | 16.74 | 19.58 | 15.789 | 265 | 310 | — | |
LV-T45 "Swivel" Liquid Fuel Engine | Small | 1 200 | 1.50 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 167.97 | 215.0 | 11.42 | 14.62 | 13.703 | 250 | 320 | 3.0 | |
S3 KS-25 "Vector" Liquid Fuel Engine | Small, Radial mounted | 18 000 | 4.00 | 2 000 | 22 | 50 | 936.51 | 1 000.0 | 23.87 | 25.49 | 64.745 | 295 | 315 | 10.5 | |
T-1 Toroidal Aerospike "Dart" Liquid Fuel Engine | Small, Radial mounted | 3 850 | 1.00 | 2 000 | 20 | 50 | 153.53 | 180.0 | 15.66 | 18.35 | 10.797 | 290 | 340 | — | |
LV-N "Nerv" Atomic Rocket Motor[Note 2] | Small | 10 000 | 3.00 | 2 500 | 12 | 50 | 13.88 | 60.0 | 0.47 | 2.04 | 1.530 | 185 | 800 | — | |
RE-L10 "Poodle" Liquid Fuel Engine | Large | 1 300 | 1.75 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 64.29 | 250.0 | 3.75 | 14.57 | 14.568 | 90 | 350 | 4.5 | |
RE-I5 "Skipper" Liquid Fuel Engine | Large | 5 300 | 3.00 | 2 000 | 8 | 50 | 568.75 | 650.0 | 19.33 | 22.09 | 41.426 | 280 | 320 | 2.0 | |
RE-M3 "Mainsail" Liquid Fuel Engine | Large | 13 000 | 6.00 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 1 379.03 | 1 500.0 | 23.44 | 25.49 | 98.683 | 285 | 310 | 2.0 | |
LFB KR-1x2 "Twin-Boar" Liquid Fuel Engine[Note 3] | Large, Radial mounted | 17 000 (14 062.4) |
42.50 (10.50) |
2 000 | 20 | 50 | 1 866.67 | 2 000.0 | 4.48 (18.13) |
4.80 (19.42) |
135.964 | 280 | 300 | 1.5 | |
Kerbodyne KR-2L+ "Rhino" Liquid Fuel Engine | Extra large | 25 000 | 9.00 | 2 000 | 7 | 50 | 1 205.88 | 2 000.0 | 13.66 | 22.66 | 119.968 | 205 | 340 | 4.0 | |
S3 KS-25x4 "Mammoth" Liquid Fuel Engine | Extra large | 39 000 | 15.00 | 2 000 | 20 | 50 | 3 746.03 | 4 000.0 | 25.47 | 27.19 | 258.978 | 295 | 315 | 2.0 | |
CR-7 R.A.P.I.E.R. Engine[Note 4] | Small | 6 000 | 2.00 | 2 000 | 20 | 50 | 162.30 | 180.0 | 8.27 | 9.18 | 12.036 | 275 | 305 | 3.0 |
- ↑ Consumes monopropellant. (the density of monopropellant is less: 4kg/unit)
- ↑ Consumes liquid fuel only.
- ↑ The LFB KR-1x2 is a liquid fuel booster -- a combination of a "normal" engine and a fuel tank.
- ↑ The R.A.P.I.E.R. Engine is a combination of liquid fuel and jet engine. Only the liquid fuel engine properties are shown.
Ion engines
There is a new third form called ion engine which uses ionized atoms, xenon gas, and accelerate them in a electro-magnetic field. This type of engine is very efficient but has a very low thrust making it only suitable for probes already in space.
Advantages
- A very high specific impulse.
- The xenon gas can be moved between tanks, which means that spacecraft with ion engines and tanks are easier and more resource-efficient to refuel than vessels with solid fuel engines, which required the entire engine bay to be replaced, while xenon gas can quickly be moved between two docked vessels.
- The fuel doesn't need to be moved as xenon gas is used evenly.
- Modular design: fuel and other components can be stored elsewhere in the craft.
- Throttle can be adjusted depending on thrust requirements.
- Can be switched off and re-ignited at will.
Disadvantages
- Very low thrust so it is impossible to lift off with ion engines only.
- No thrust vectoring is available.
RCS thrusters
The RCS thrusters are allowing an craft to change the attitude, because their thrust is low allowing tiny changes in velocity. Usually it isn't used as a main engine because the specific impulse is lower than any other liquid fuel engine.
Advantages
- The monopropellant can be moved between tanks, which means that spacecraft with RCS thrusters and tanks are easier and more resource-efficient to refuel than vessels with solid fuel engines, which required the entire engine bay to be replaced, while xenon gas can quickly be moved between two docked vessels.
- The fuel doesn't need to be moved as monopropellant is used evenly.
- Modular design: fuel and other components can be stored elsewhere in the craft.
- Can be switched off and re-ignited at will.
Disadvantages
- Very low thrust so it is impossible to lift off with ion engines only.
- No thrust vectoring is available.
- The user can only switch engines on or off, while the SAS can run them on different thrust levels in between.
- The specific impulse is, especially in atmosphere, low and comparable with solid rocket engines.
Image | Part | Radial size | Cost () |
Mass (t) |
Max. Temp. (K) |
Tolerance (m/s) |
Tolerance (g) |
Thrust (kN) |
Fuel (/s) |
Isp (s) (atm) | Isp (s) (vac) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RV-1X Variable Thruster Block | Radial mounted | 30 | 0.005 | 1 500 | 12 | 50 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 100 | 240 | |
Place Anywhere 1 Linear RCS Port | Radial mounted | 15 | 0.001 | 1 500 | 12 | 50 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 100 | 240 | |
RV-105 RCS Thruster Block | Radial mounted | 45 | 0.04 | 1 500 | 15 | 50 | 1.0 | 0.11 | 100 | 240 | |
Place-Anywhere 7 Linear RCS Port | Radial mounted | 25 | 0.02 | 2 600 | 15 | 50 | 2.0 | 0.21 | 100 | 240 | |
Vernor Engine[Note 1] | Radial mounted | 150 | 0.08 | 2 000 | 15 | 50 | 12.0 | 0.94 | 140 | 260 |
- ↑ The Vernor Engine uses a liquid fuel/oxidizer mixture.